Both selective laser sintering (SLS) and selective laser casting (SLA) 3D printing processes have a number of benefits for manufacturers. Both processes are affordable, fast and able to produce highly detailed parts. Each process has its own advantages, depending on what you're trying to accomplish with your design.
Understanding the differences between SLS and SLA 3D printing can help you decide which one is best for your project.
The SLS process uses a laser to fuse powder into a solid object layer by layer. The SLS process is also called directed energy deposition (DED). The powder is first placed into a vat. Then, the printer uses a laser to sinter the material together, layer by layer. This means that only the material that's touching the laser will be fused together. After each layer is completed, the printer will move the powder slightly and then begin fusing another layer.
The SLA process works like an inkjet printer, but instead of printing with ink it uses light to solidify resin into objects. The resin is placed in a vat and then exposed to ultraviolet light through a digital projector. The ultraviolet light hardens the resin wherever it touches it, leading to an object being created one thin layer at a time.
While both processes are able to achieve high levels of detail, SLA tends to be more accurate than SLS because it doesn't use powder, which can often lead to rough surfaces and excess material in your print files.
SLS has been around longer than SLA 3D printing and has been used for creating prototypes for years before SLA was even invented.
However, since its invention in 1986, SLAs popularity has grown exponentially because of its ability to create detailed parts that are smooth enough for use as finished products. It's also. This article covers the pros and cons of each process as well as their ideal use cases. Read on to learn more about these two 3D printing processes and which is the right choice for you.
SLS is an additive manufacturing (3D printing) process that uses a laser to sinter powdered materials in a bed of sand. The process uses a computer-controlled laser to selectively fuse a bed of sand, binding the sand together to build a 3D part.
The part is built up layer by layer, with each new layer being fused to the sand below it. This process is distinguished from other types of 3D printing by the fact that it uses a bed of sand as its build platform. On top of the sand is either a powder material or a special surface that allows the laser to selectively sinter the sand and not the powder.
The sand is then removed from the part after printing is complete. Since the build platform is sand, the parts are more robust than those made by SLA 3D printing, which have a very thin layer of polymer on top of the build platform.
The SLS process was invented in 1989 by Dr. Carl Deckard at the University of Texas at Austin. This process was initially used to make complex geometries for aerospace applications and has since been applied to a variety of industries including dental, automotive, jewelry, and orthopedic prosthetics. SLS is also referred to as laser-sintering or direct metal laser sintering (DMLS).
SLA is a type of photochemical process that uses a UV laser to cure a photopolymer liquid resin into a solid object. The liquid resin is usually contained in a tank and pumped to the part build tray where it is exposed to the UV laser. The UV laser then causes a chemical reaction that solidifies the liquid resin.
This process is also distinguished from other types of 3D printing by the fact that it uses a liquid material as opposed to a powder. The photopolymer resin can be used to print a wide range of materials, including thermoplastics, engineering plastics, silicone, and metals.
The SLA 3D printing process has a higher upfront cost than SLS due to the need for a vacuum chamber and UV laser. But it has a higher build volume and better resolution than SLS. What’s more, SLA can produce parts that are aesthetically and structurally superior to SLS parts.
The two processes share some similarities and are both ideal for creating functional prototypes and end-use parts. The biggest difference between SLS and SLA is the material used. SLS uses a powdered material, while SLA uses a liquid resin.
The powdered material is used in SLS because it can withstand the pressure created by the laser sintering process. SLA uses a liquid resin because it is able to be cured by the UV laser. This means that both processes can be used to create a variety of materials.
But the SLS process is limited to using just a few materials, while the SLA process can be used to create parts with a variety of materials. The build volume is the other main difference between SLS and SLA. The SLS process has a larger build volume than SLA, making it ideal for larger parts. The SLA process has a smaller build volume, making it ideal for smaller parts.
- Higher build volume than SLA
- The SLS process has a larger build volume than the SLA process, making it ideal for larger parts.
- Robust parts - The SLS process uses a bed of sand as its build platform. The sand is then removed from the part after printing is complete.
- A variety of materials - The SLS process uses a powdered material, which can be used to create a variety of materials.
- Fast - Since the powdered material is already prepared for printing and does not have to be cured, the SLS process is faster than the SLA process.
- Affordable - The SLS process is a cheaper and more cost-effective alternative to the SLA process.
- Excellent resolution - The SLA process uses a UV laser to cure a liquid resin, which produces parts with excellent resolution.
- Better aesthetics - Since the liquid resin is used, the SLA process can produce parts that are aesthetically superior to SLS parts.
- Materials - The SLA process can create parts with a variety of different materials, including thermoplastics, engineering plastics, silicone, and metals.
- Faster than SLS - The SLA process has a shorter build time than the SLS process because the parts are already formed instead of being formed while being printed.
- Fewer materials - The SLS process uses only a few materials, which can make it difficult to find a suitable material for certain projects.
- Part fragility - The SLS process uses a bed of sand as its build platform. The sand is then removed from the part after printing is complete. This means that the parts are more fragile than parts created by the SLA process.
- Longer build time - The SLS process has a longer build time than the SLA process because the parts are created layer by layer.
- Higher upfront cost - The SLS process has a higher upfront cost than the SLA process because it requires a UV laser and a vacuum chamber.
- Single-use parts - The SLA process creates single-use parts. This means that the parts are only good for one use before they break down and must be discarded.
- High upfront cost - The SLA process has a higher upfront cost than the SLS process because it requires a UV laser and a vacuum chamber.
The SLS process is ideal for creating complex parts that require a high degree of detail. This process is also ideal for rapid prototyping and creating parts with a low volume.
The SLA process is ideal for creating aesthetic, high-resolution parts that require a variety of materials.
The SLS and SLA processes are both great for creating functional prototypes and end-use parts.
What’s more, both processes are cost-effective, quick and able to produce high-quality parts. The only real difference is the materials each process is able to create.
Sign Up to get our monthly news Letter
All Rights Reserved | Mitchell and Son Additive Manufacturing Ltd | Registered Company in England and Wales | Company Number : 12038697
| Public Liability Insurance no. 14615097
Insurer: AXA XL