logo
Business Award

Blog Layout

Design Intent | Reliable Part Modelling 02

Paul Munford • 26 July 2019
Design Intent | Reliable Part Modelling with Autodesk Inventor 02

An Autodesk Inventor part model illustrating design intentIf I gave you a model of a 50mm by 50mm by 6mm steel plate, with an M10 clearance hole through the middle of the face, and asked you to change the width of that plate – what should happen to the hole?

Using feature-based modelling we can decide how our model will change, this is known as ‘Design Intent’ .

Relationships

The key to creating complex models in Autodesk Inventor is maintaining control of relationships.

If you don’t understand the relationships you’ve built between parameters, sketches, features, bodies, parts constraints and assemblies – your model will not update in a predictable fashion.

The bad news is that Inventor won’t manage this for you (it can’t read your mind!).

The good news is that YOU have full control over this process.

Relationship rulesAutodesk Inventor | Reliable Part Modelling | Parametric part design intent relationship rules

 

  • No unintended Relationships
  • Relationships are kept to a minimum
  • All relationships are planned and purposeful
  • All relationships are obvious and easily understood

 

Relationships, order of preference

Some relationships are more complicated for Inventor to work out than others. When you are planning your design intent, keep this in mind.

Create simple parametric relationships where you can, create complex feature to feature relationships only when you have too.

Parametric Relationships

Inventor is a computer programme. Computers are really, really good at Math. It may come as no surprise that the simplest relationship for Inventor to manage is a mathematical one.

Parameter1 Drives Sketch1 Geometry.

  • Can you express a relationship in your design as an equation?
  • Could you use iLogic to describe complex formulas?

Sketch to Sketch

If you can’t express a relationship mathematically, and you need to express it geometrically, the safest way is to relate a sketch to another sketch.

This is known as a ‘Horizontal’ relationship – both sketches are on the same level. We are minimizing the number of feature relationships Inventor must calculate, and therefore reducing the opportunity for error.

Parameter1 Drives Sketch1 which drives Sketch2.

Sketch to Feature

Creating a sketch on the face of an existing feature is a common workflow. It’s not wrong to do this, but it’s worth recognising what you just did.

Parameter Drives Sketch1 which drives Feature1 which drives Sketch2.

We have now created a far more complex sequence of events which Inventor must calculate to get a result.

Powerful, certainly, but frustrating if we unintentionally created a relationship we weren’t aware of.

Feature to Feature

Feature to feature relationships are the most complicated relationships for Inventor to calculate, because it must calculate two ‘branches’ of features before it can compare the two branches to get a result.

These Feature to Feature relationships can be the trickiest type of relationship to edit parametrically, because you must make sure that all the contributing features make sense in order for the final feature to make sense.

 

Parameter Drives Sketch1 which drives Feature1 which drives Sketch3 which drives feature 3.

Parameter2 Drives Sketch2 which drives Feature2 which also drives Feature 3

Planning design intent

If you are going to spend even a day modelling a design, it’s worth spending 20 minutes thinking about it before you start.

Back in the mad, bad old days of 2D CAD we were more productive when we mashed the keys quicker. This approach won’t reward you when creating parametric part models.

Productivity in Inventor is more like playing chess. Thinking about your design intent, and planning ahead will help you to create more stable, more useful, more reliable part models – which will reward you and your colleagues for the duration of your project.

Preparation | Reliable Part Modelling 03

This blog post is based on an Autodesk University class, by Luke Mihelcic and Paul Munford. You can watch a recording of the class, and download a handout that goes with this presentation from the Autodesk University website here:
MFG226705: Reliable Modeling Techniques for Complex Part Design in Inventor

Edit 2020/11/24 

This class was updated and repeated for Autodesk University 2020 . You can find the revised version of the class, with video, handout, and dataset here:
‘Reliable Modeling Techniques for Complex Part Design in Inventor’ At AU2020

We also created a second part to the class: ‘ Reliable Techniques for Complex Assembly Design in Inventor ‘ – Here’s the link:
‘Reliable Techniques for Complex Assembly Design in Inventor’ at AU2020

Fusion 360’s Additive Manufacturing Workspace is a game-changer for design engineers and manufactur
by Dwight Mitchell 5 December 2024
Fusion 360’s Additive Manufacturing Workspace is a game-changer for design engineers and manufacturing,
3D Printing Services and Technology
by Dwight Mitchell 16 July 2024
3D printing, also known as additive manufacturing, has transformed industries by enabling the creation of complex geometries that traditional methods can't achieve.
3D Printing: Innovations, Challenges, and Applications
by Dwight Mitchell 10 July 2024
The world of 3D printing or Additive manufacturing is changing at a neck-breaking speed with new technology and new materials entering the market frequently.
3D Printing with Polystyrene (High Impact Polystyrene (HIPS)):
by Dwight Mitchell 4 July 2024
3D Printing with Polystyrene (High Impact Polystyrene (HIPS))
Comparative Analysis of 3D Printing Filaments
by Dwight Mitchell 2 July 2024
I know it can be confusing to know which is the right material and also which is the best brand to use.
Threaded Inserts in 3D Printed Products
by Dwight Mitchell 27 June 2024
One of the shortfalls of printing a functional part in plastic is that it can wear very quickly especially if you are producing parts that need to or have a screw fixture.
Which is the Best TPU Filaments in 2024?
by Dwight Mitchell 18 June 2024
The Quality of the prints that the Creality K1 and K1 max produce is fantastic
 Materials for your project, is ASA or ABS or PC right for you?
by Dwight Mitchell 17 June 2024
When having to decide on the type of materials to choose for your project, the choice can often be confusing as 3D Print Filament manufacturers and suppliers
ASA 3D Printing Filament: A Comprehensive Guide
by Dwight Mitchell 15 May 2024
ASA 3D Printing Filament: A Comprehensive Guide
Reverse Engineering and Hyper 3D Printing
by Dwight Mitchell 5 April 2024
In the rapidly evolving world of manufacturing, staying ahead means not just keeping pace with current trends but pre-emptively leaping towards future innovations.
More posts
Share by: